I just received a $1 million rental property in Queens, NYC, which is fully paid off and held in a trust. Examining the historical cash flow, I’m left puzzled because it seems like I’m either missing something crucial about real estate or my property’s performance is far from ideal.
Here’s a breakdown:
- Last year’s rental income: $36,000 (3.6% yield).
- Annual expenses: $9,000 for taxes and insurance (0.91%), $12,600 for maintenance (1.26%), and $1,000 for management fees (0.1%).
- If I hire a management company, it would cost about 10% of rental income, or $3,600 (0.36%).
This leaves me with a pre-tax net income of $9,800 annually, translating to a mere 0.98% return, which drops to about 0.64% after estimated 35% income tax, equating to only $530 monthly.
This seems unreasonably low, especially since there’s no mortgage. If there was one, I’d be in a worse position!
While I know property appreciation in NYC is significant, the thought of having a mortgage seems daunting. If I assumed a 5% interest on 80% of the property with a 20% down payment, I’d still face negative cash flow. It seems like investing in real estate just isn’t yielding the diversification I anticipated, as the stock market could provide better returns without the hassles and risks of property management.
Also, from what I’ve read, it appears scaling is crucial for real estate success. Should I keep this property or would my capital serve me better elsewhere? What essential principles of real estate am I possibly overlooking?