Ray White mandates an automated payment system that adds unnecessary fees and limits free options for tenants. Critics argue this tactic exploits renters. Support tenant rights by rejecting such policies.
im not convined. forcing renttech adds extra fees and limits tenant choice. it feels exploitive and more about profiting than actually helping renters. imho, letting us choose free options would be way fare better.
I believe that although the intent of using RentTech might be to provide a more efficient payment platform, the inflexible enforcement of the system raises valid concerns. From my experience, when a payment platform imposes extra fees without alternatives, it can result in dissatisfaction among tenants and create a perception of exploitation. It’s understandable that companies aim for operational efficiency, but balancing that with tenant choice is essential. A system that offers both flexible options and transparent fee structures would likely serve the interests of both the tenants and the management more effectively.
i get that tech is meant to be efficient, but forcing it with extra fees seems unfair. tenants deserve choices without extra costs, ya know?
I wonder if enforcing RentTech really aims to boost efficiency at the expense of tenant freedom. Isn’t it possible to balance tech and choice? What alternative approaches might work without extra fees?