After reviewing my NYC property's cash flow, I'm baffled by how real estate supposedly generates profits

My fully-owned NYC property yields minimal net income after all expenses. Considering potential mortgage interest, maintenance, and management fees, does real estate truly offer better returns compared to investments like stocks?

real estate may seem slow, but its value builds over time thru equity and tax breakz; i feel this long-term focus can outpace stocks for risk averse folks, even if cash flow isnt flashy.

After analyzing cash flow issues on my own property, I have found that the direct income might not capture the true value of investing in real estate. Although managing a property in NYC often appears to yield modest net income, its long-term benefits like equity buildup, favorable tax treatments, and inflation protection are significant. Compared to stocks, real estate can offer a solid hedge against market volatility. It often requires patience and strategic upgrades, but over time it compensates with consistent capital growth and added asset stability.