Indian flats hide extra fees and restrictions, depreciating over time for developers, banks, and politicians. In contrast, land is finite, appreciates, and offers true, unrestricted ownership.
lol i reckon flats got hidden costs and restrictions that dont add up for a safe investment. land, on the other hand, seems more reliable in value over time. not saying its perfect, but it beats the hassle and murkiness of indian flats anyday.
I have observed that investing in flats can be more complicated than it appears, as there are often hidden fees and ongoing regulatory constraints that reduce practical value over time. In my experience, land presents fewer uncertainties; its inherent value usually appreciates with time and offers clearer ownership rights. Although every investment carries risks, the long-term benefits of owning land seem to outweigh those of Indian flats, which require navigating additional layers of bureaucracy and unexpected financial burdens.