Opinion letter addressing robocall tactics by the Greater Boston Real Estate Board

I joined colleagues in denouncing the Greater Boston Real Estate Board’s robocalls opposing a real estate transfer fee that could fund affordable housing.

i think these robocals feel too cold and impersonal. maybe try more face-to-face meetups or online chats that actually lets people feel heard instead of being spammed.

I have found that impersonal methods such as robocalls often do little to build trust or incite genuine dialogue regarding contentious issues. From previous experiences following grassroots campaigns, I noticed that community members respond more positively when approached through targeted, interactive channels. An approach that involves moderated online forums or small-scale public meetings can foster a stronger sense of connection and trust. Such strategies have historically enabled clearer communication of ideas, thus enhancing community solidarity and device mutual respect in debates over public matters like affordable housing funding.

Fascinating take! I’ve wondered if there might be more respectful outreach methods rather than these intrusive calls. What other tactics could compel dialogue without annoying property owners? Curious to hear more unique ideas on ensuring transparency and community support.

Hey, has anyone explored blending tech with community vibes? Instead of impersonal calls, maybe local SMS polls or casual online chats could spark real dialogue. What other creative outreach ideas do you think might make the difference?