My friend in real estate recommends updating all toilets and bathtubs in non-new properties for improved hygiene and reliability. Is this a standard approach in home buying?
Just went through that dilemma myself! A quick expert inspection saved me money on unnecessary replacements. Sometimes fixing or deep cleaning works wonders. What’s your take on balancing device aesthetics with functionality?
Through my own process of buying an older home, I discovered that upgrading toilets and tubs may not always be necessary if they still serve their purpose reliably. I decided to assess the plumbing system comprehensively first, which helped me understand that sometimes a thorough cleaning and minor repair was enough to secure hygiene and function without the cost of full replacement. My approach was based on the device’s overall condition rather than a blanket replacement strategy. It all boils down to evaluating each fixture on a case-by-case basis and remaining mindful of budget constraints.
In my experience, updating toilets and bathtubs during a purchase can be beneficial, but it isn’t always essential if the items are in good condition. When I bought my last home, I opted to inspect the entire plumbing system first instead of replacing everything on a whim. After evaluating the fixtures and consulting with professionals, minor repairs and selective replacements were deemed sufficient to ensure reliability and hygiene. A cautious, case-by-case evaluation tends to yield better investment results than a blanket approach, balancing cost and long-term benefits.
i think its best to check the condition your self. my neighbor didnt upgrade everything cause his fixtures were still solid. sometimes minor repairs work fine instead of a full upgrade.