Australia’s tenant protection framework suffers from weak enforcement. A hybrid model that centralizes oversight, investigations, and penalties—using fines, bans, and stricter licensing—could heighten accountability for property agents and landlords.
I find the idea intriguing but wonder about potential red tape. Could a centralized regulator really speed up solutions, or might it burden tenants with more delays? How do you think voters would weigh accountability against bureaucracy?
From practical experience, establishing a centralized regulator with an ombudsman role could benefit tenant protection by ensuring consistent oversight over property practices. While there may be concerns regarding administrative burdens, my observation is that implementation details will be crucial. If designed to streamline complaints and enforce accountability transparently, such a reform is likely to gain support. Positive outcomes in improved working practices could encourage voters to favor a system that provides effective safeguards without creating unnecessary red tape.